LG Watch Style vs Fossil Q Founder 2.0
Smartwatches have come a long way since their debut in the market. Wearable technology has become a popular trend in the last few years, and many tech companies have been eager to jump on board. Two of the most popular entry-level smartwatches on the market are the LG Watch Style and Fossil Q Founder 2.0.
In this blog post, we will provide a detailed and unbiased comparison of the LG Watch Style and Fossil Q Founder 2.0. We will compare them based on design, features, battery life, compatibility, and price.
Design
One of the main reasons why people use smartwatches is that it allows them to stay connected without having to pull out their smartphones. In terms of design, the LG Watch Style and Fossil Q Founder 2.0 have different approaches.
The LG Watch Style is has a slim profile, is lightweight, and is available in three colors: silver, rose gold, and titanium. Its stainless steel body is paired with a leather strap, which is interchangeable. It also has a rotating power button that allows you to navigate through the screen, similar to the Apple Watch.
On the other hand, the Fossil Q Founder 2.0 has a larger display, with a chunkier body, but it looks more like a traditional watch. It has a round face, which is available in black, silver, and rose gold. It also has interchangeable bands, so you can switch it up depending on your outfit or preference.
Features
When it comes to features, both LG Watch Style and Fossil Q Founder 2.0 boast various features that cater to different types of users.
The LG Watch Style is powered by Android Wear 2.0, which means that it is compatible with both Android and iOS phones. It has a 1.2-inch P-OLED display, which is protected by Gorilla Glass. It also has a 4GB internal storage, 512MB RAM, and a 240mAh battery. Some of its features include a heart rate sensor, Google Assistant, GPS, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC, which allows mobile payments.
The Fossil Q Founder 2.0 is also powered by Android Wear 2.0. It has a 1.2-inch AMOLED display, which is protected by Gorilla Glass. It comes with 4GB internal storage, 512MB RAM, and a 360mAh battery. Its features include the Google Play Store, heart rate sensor, microphone, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC.
Battery Life
Battery life is an essential factor when it comes to smartwatches. The LG Watch Style and Fossil Q Founder 2.0 have different battery capacities, which results in differences in battery life.
The LG Watch Style has a 240mAh battery, which can last up to 24 hours on a single charge. It also has a low-power mode to extend the battery life, although it will disable some features.
The Fossil Q Founder 2.0 has a larger 360mAh battery, which can last up to 24 hours. However, its battery life can vary depending on usage, and some users have reported needing to charge it daily.
Compatibility
Compatibility is important since not everyone uses the same type of smartphone. The LG Watch Style and Fossil Q Founder 2.0 are both powered by Android Wear 2.0, which is supported on both Android and iOS devices. This means that whichever phone you have, you can still use the smartwatch.
Price
Price is another essential factor when it comes to deciding which smartwatch to buy. The LG Watch Style and Fossil Q Founder 2.0 are both competitively priced, making them popular options for entry-level smartwatches.
The LG Watch Style retailed for around $250 when it was first launched, but has since decreased in price. Currently, you can find a new LG Watch Style for around $120, while a refurbished model is even lower.
The Fossil Q Founder 2.0, on the other hand, retailed for around $275 when it was first launched. However, its price has also decreased, and one can expect to find a new model for around $150, while a refurbished model will be cheaper.
Conclusion
Both LG Watch Style and Fossil Q Founder 2.0 are stylish and reliable entry-level smartwatches. Their features, design, battery life, compatibility, and pricing set them apart from each other. It ultimately depends on your personal preference on design and features, but they are both great options in terms of value and affordability.